Jesus
said, “But the truth is, there were many widows in Israel in the time of Elijah
when the heaven was shut up for three years and six months when there was a
severe famine over all the land; yet, Elijah was sent to none of them except to
a widow at Zarephath in Sidon” (Luke 4:25-26).
In this passage from Luke, Christ’s Revelation
that his Mission includes outreach to those groups outside of Israel provokes a negative response from the people of Nazareth. By doing so, they show how
the preservation of Religious and Social boundaries can obstruct God’s plan.
When Jesus returned from his forty
days in the desert he began his Ministry in the towns around Nazareth. This
meant his reputation preceded his arrival to his hometown. As he read the text
from Isaiah, the expectations of the people in the Synagogue likely grew.
Unlike the Political and Religious elites in Jerusalem, here was someone who
championed their concerns. There were no boundaries between him and them. However,
when Christ recalled the stories of Elijah’s care for the widow at Zarephath
and Eisha’s cure of Naaman the Syrian, they became hostile. These foreigners were
outside the boundaries of the Jewish nation. His inclusion of Gentiles among
the individuals to whom he Ministered implied these Religious and Social
divisions were unimportant. For the people in the Synagogue, the exclusivity of
the relationships between God and the Jewish nation as well as Jesus and the
population of Nazareth were non-negotiables. They demonstrated their rejection
of him through an attempt on his life. Yet, since the Good News Christ proclaimed
was the liberation of all individuals from Sin and all were sinners, the only important
boundary was between those who accepted or rejected Salvation. Since this was
God’s plan, Jesus survived the attack and continued his Mission.
Our Modern world understands the importance
of boundaries. Nations will go to war to extend their boundaries, enhance their
security or prosperity. Groups within society will shrink their boundaries to
exclude members who might dilute their collective identity. Political leaders
will use boundaries between citizens to rally supporters and vilify opponents.
Religious Sects will frequently create boundaries in order to distinguish the
pious few from the unholy masses. Often when individuals question the need for
these boundaries Institutions and those who control them respond with
hostility. Anyone on one side of a boundary would be threatened by the
possibility that those on the other side are not really different from them.
While all organizations, including the Church, must have certain beliefs and
practices which are non-negotiable in order to maintain their integrity and
distinguish them from the rest of society, they must also be aware of how they
draw boundaries and regularly re-examine their justification. There was a time
when a Catholic who wished to marry a Non-Catholic could not celebrate their
Wedding inside a Church building. The reason given was such a celebration would
cause scandal in the Parish. During the time of Vatican II, this justification
was challenged by Bishops who thought the Church should indicate its support
for any couple seeking to show their Marriage was rooted in their faith by
permitting them to celebrate their Wedding in the Church. Like Jesus in this
passage, it is necessary that we recognize boundaries which interfere with the
unfolding of God’s plan and challenge them.
Since legitimate differences exist
between individuals and groups, some boundaries will always be necessary. Yet,
if they do not serve a justifiable purpose they become an obstacle to what is
true and right. Catholics need to be able to distinguish whether a boundary is
necessary and respond accordingly.
January 30, 2022