“Amazed and astonished, the crowd asked, ‘Are not these who are speaking Galileans? And how is it that we hear, each of us, in our own native language?” (Acts 2:7-8).
Luke’s account of the crowd’s
reaction to the disciples speaking in different languages indicates that
diversity is not a foreign concept to the Church. The crowd consisted of people
from all around the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern regions. The disciples
were all from Galilee which meant they spoke Aramaic and maybe some Hebrew.
They likely had little formal education beyond some rudimentary religious
formation. Yet, here they were talking about some serious religious topics to
an international crowd. Their message was the same: the prophecies of Joel were
fulfilled through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, a
descendant of David and the promised Messiah. Yet, the medium by which this
message was communicated was the diverse languages which were understood by
members of every group. Diversity was not a problem but the means by which the
Good News could be passed on by these individuals to the members of their
communities back home. This meant more people would hear it sooner.
Diversity is a word which has become
less fashionable over the past few years. It is often associated with
“political correctness” and imposing a view of the world on people against
their will. Uniformity is much more convenient and efficient. When everyone prays
in one language (English, Latin or whichever one is chosen), celebrates liturgy
in one style or follows one set of devotions, life is simpler. Yet, that is not
what God chose to do at Pentecost. He could have made everyone speak the same
language but showed how unity in what is important (doctrine) could be achieved
through diversity in what was less important (language). There may be a lesson
in this story for us. In addition, uniformity is an exercise of power. Who
decides which language is used, how the Mass is celebrated or which devotions
are promoted? Of course, there are certain things which are non-negotiable:
like bread and wine being used when celebrating the Eucharist. Yet, the Church
is changing. For most of its history, it has been dominated by thinking
associated with Europe and North America. Its center of gravity is now shifting
to other parts of the world. Over the next decades and centuries, new ideas from
Africa, Asia and South America will no doubt influence the Church’s thinking. Within
Canada, individuals from these parts of the world compose larger portions of
most parishes and in some cases have their own parish communities. As long as
the essential doctrines and practices are preserved, diversity may enable the
Church to connect with the lives of ordinary people throughout the world in a
more effective way. We may witness a new Pentecost when people unfamiliar with
Christ may listen to our message.
As I learned that day on the bus,
diversity is part of daily life. The question is how do we respond to it. As
Catholics, we can flee from diversity in fear and hide within our own
particular group which speaks the same language, worships in the same manner
and practices the same devotions or we can embrace it becoming comfortable
learning from and co-existing with those who may do things differently while
sharing the same faith. The choice is ours.
June 8, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment